DMT, did you read the comments this guy left? If someone is going to be so inclined to write comments on such a sensitive subject, should they make sure they're very, very accurate with their aligations? Apparently, based on Marks' article he was able to come to his conclusions, he owed Mark the decency and respect to send a PM at least to have a dialogue. I would suggest that the "other" SPer should have contacted Mark for some definitive answers to his questions. But we all know - making it into a personality pissing match won't address the underlying issues, no matter what else. This topic is (sadly) cyclical and I have never seen a once size fits all answer. I think we will find the very nature of this sad event presents us with the schizo need to at once analyze and at the same time placate, feelings.
So for someone removed from the personalities involved, when and where should these analysis discussions be conducted? But I also seem to remember site mgmt stating quite clearly such discussions weren't going to be tendered in the Medicine and Rescue forum either. I would tend to agree its not the comments section after an article. Dingus Milktoast wrote:To turn this to a more constructive purpose - given the sensitive nature of the incident (SP members involved) where and when IS the appropriate venue for accident analysis and critique?
0 kommentar(er)
